Social Contract For A New Kind Of Research -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Social Contract For A New Kind Of Research? Answer: Introduction Geecy with Tabalbag stayed in a small flat somewhere around in Mona Road. Geecy also had an illicit love affair with a cook named Amin. This illicit love affair will be discussed in the following discourse. This discourse will grandstand the result of this illicit relationship and will also show lights on Amin's murder case in details on the basis of four ethical theories - utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue and contract. Utilitarianism Ethics Theory on murder case of Amin Sthapit Roy Tabalbag was accused of murdering Amin for his self-fulfillment. He brutally killed Amin though he was innocent. Tabalbag's girlfriend cheated him slept with another man, his girlfriend was the criminal (Rosas Koenigs, 2014). Geecy should take the responsibility for what she did. Tabalbag should take harsh decisions and should take legal actions against her misdeeds, instead of in anger he stabbed and killed Amin though it was not his fault. Since Amin was honest and did no harm to the society and the surroundings, so according to Utilitarianism Ethics Theory, Amin should not be killed. Amin killed him solely to fulfil his wish, to take revenge from his girlfriend which is completely unethical. In any way, this kind of act cannot be supported and Tabalbag requires harsh capital punishment (Barrow, 2015). He accepted that the act of manslaughtering is a wrongdoing but he did not accept the crime he committed, thus he must be imprisoned and should teach him the required lesson. Deontology Ethics Theory on murder case of Amin Sthapit This ethical theory does not encourage or entertain killing an individual. Amin was innocent and did no harm to the society. Thus Tabalbags crime cannot be supported according to deontology ethics theory (Playford, Roberts Playford, 2015). Amin was probably unaware that Geecy was playing with him on one side and Tabalbag on the other side. Tabalbag found Geecy behavioural change and he predicted that Geecy might be involved with another man. Therefore, he installed Dr Fone to keep track of his girlfriends phone calls. He also checked Geecy laptop and there he found Geecy sending email to Ryde and telling him she would not be able to attend lectures. Since then Tabalbag was getting ready to catch her girlfriend, Geecy. Thus from the above scenario, it can be concluded that he knew all the things. He should have control over his emotions and should take smart decisions to handle the scenario. Geecy cheated him; Amin had nothing to do, so Tabalbag should take the charge of every misdee d (Chakrabarty Bass, 2015). Though he surrendered to police he is not prepared to accept the reality and the truth that he has actually committed a crime brutally killing Amin and this crime cannot be taken granted. Virtue Ethics Theory on murder case of Amin Sthapit Virtue ethics deal with the character of a particular person or a particular individual. In this scenario, Tabalbags character will be judged. He had a girlfriend and loved her very much. However, her character seemed strange to Tabalbag and he asked for the reason, he too asked whether she was involved with any other man or not but Geecy completely disagreed (Tsoukas, 2017). Though she was then involved with Amin she never wants to disclose that. Geecy should choose anyone between Amin and Tabalbag but she cheated both. Tabalbag so had to know the truth. So he installed a program to track Geecys phone calls and he also accessed her laptop to investigate further. He found that Geecy was not going to attend Rydes lectures (Bruni Sugden, 2013). He tried to find out what Geecy wanted to know in between, thus he tracked her and found her with Amin having sex. He could not take hold of that situation and killed Amin with a knife. The Public Defender also agreed Tabalbag committed crime in anger and anybody in that scenario could have done the same. He accepted that the act of manslaughtering was wrong, but he was not prepared to agree that he actually committed a crime stabbing Amin. Though he had deep feelings for his girlfriend he should understand that he committed an unpardonable crime. Geecy requested Tabalbag to stop but he did not stop stabbing which ultimately costs Amin's life (Mizzoni, 2017). Tabalbag for his stubborn attitude must be punished severely. Contract Ethics Theory on murder case of Amin Sthapit The ethics theory basically deals with a particular set of rules and policies and every citizen must follow these rules for the welfare of the society. Tabalbag should follow the social contract ethics for good, he committed a serious crime by brutally killing Amin which is really not acceptable to anybody and the society. The society should learn this kind of act is vulnerable to risks and threats to anybody and if entertained can lead to several such crimes. Thus Tabalbag requires severe punishment or capital punishment so that the society can learn this kind of act should not get repeated (Vayena et al., 2015). The Australian Government must make laws and everybody I Australia should follow the rules. The death sentence is also given in certain scenarios measuring the extent of crime they have committed. Since Amin was honest and did no harm to the society and to anybody including Tabalbag, killing him Tabalbag should take all the blame. Geecy was the main criminal she cheated both Amin and Tabalbag, Tabalbag could have taken severe actions against Geecy instead in anger Tabalbag killed Amin who did no harm to Tabalbag (Birnbaum Lach, 2014). He accepted that the act of manslaughtering was wrong. He too surrendered himself to police but he was not prepared to plead guilty of the crime he committed. He should understand that killing an innocent person for no reason is harmful to the society and to anybody. It is a huge loss for the society and this kind of crime cannot be entertained at any cost (Bowie, 2015). The society loses a cook just for Tabalbag's misdeeds. Geecy, on the other hand, should realize that she should have respect for the relationship and should have respect for Tabalbag, her approach to Amin lead to this mishap. Conclusion It can be concluded from the above discourse that it was completely unethical to kill Amin, he was honest and innocent and did no harm to the society and to Tabalbag. The ethical theories utilitarian, deontology, virtue and contract discussed over here suggested that it was completely unethical to kill Amin. The first theory depicted that Tabalbag should receive capital punishment or severe punishment for brutally stabbing Amin though he did no harm to anybody, the second one highlights that Tabalbag predicted beforehand that Geecy was involved with another man, he should have acted responsibly and should have taken serious actions against Geecy instead he killed Amin. The virtue ethical theory stated that Tabalbag's stubborn attitude is the reason for this mishap, he should have stopped stabbing repeatedly on request of Geecy but he did not bother to halt. The contract ethics also suggested that he requires punishment for the welfare of the society. References Barrow, R., (2015).Utilitarianism: A contemporary statement. Routledge. Birnbaum, R. Lach, L., (2014). Teaching about what ethical social work practice means: Responsibility starts with schools of social work.Intervention 2014,140, pp.37-43. Bowie, N.E., (2015). Richard De George and the Use of Ethical Theory in Applied Ethics.Journal of Business Ethics,127(4), pp.699-706. Bruni, L. Sugden, R., (2013). Reclaiming virtue ethics for economics.The Journal of Economic Perspectives,27(4), pp.141-163. Chakrabarty, S. Bass, A.E., (2015). Comparing virtue, consequentialist, and deontological ethics-based corporate social responsibility: Mitigating microfinance risk in institutional voids.Journal of Business Ethics,126(3), pp.487-512. Mizzoni, J., 2017.Ethics: the basics. John Wiley Sons. Playford, R.C., Roberts, T. Playford, E.D., (2015). Deontological and utilitarian ethics: a brief introduction in the context of disorders of consciousness.Disability and rehabilitation,37(21), pp.2006-2011. Rosas, A. Koenigs, M., (2014). Beyond utilitarianism: Maximizing the clinical impact of moral judgment research.Social neuroscience,9(6), pp.661-667. Tsoukas, H., (2017). Strategy and virtue: developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics.Strategic Organization. Vayena, E., Brownsword, R., Edwards, S.J., Greshake, B., Kahn, J.P., Ladher, N., Montgomery, J., O'connor, D., O'neill, O., Richards, M.P. and Rid, A., (2015). Research led by participants: a new social contract for a new kind of research.Journal of medical ethics, pp.medethics-2015.